- Shipping assistants or copilots that sound right but contradict docs, policies, or customer-specific facts.
- Burning tokens on huge context windows and prompt tweaks without fixing retrieval, chunking, or data quality.
- Unable to explain why an answer went wrong—or to regress retrieval changes with a real eval harness.
- Blocked by risk, compliance, or security from expanding AI to contracts, SLAs, or internal runbooks without citations and audit trails.
LLM & AI Systems
This service helps when you are:
What I Provide:
- RAG & grounding: Ingestion contracts, structure-aware chunking, hybrid retrieval, re-ranking, metadata and entitlement-aware partitions.
- Evaluation & quality: Golden and adversarial sets, citation checks, guardrails (must-cite / must-refuse / must-escalate), pre-production gates.
- Observability: Traces for retrieval, chunk IDs, scores, model versions—so incidents are debuggable, not philosophical debates about prompts.
- Cost & latency discipline: Context budgets, caching where safe, SLOs for p95 latency and tokens—aligned with how you actually use Azure OpenAI or comparable stacks.
- Roadmap & governance: Repeatable playbooks for new corpora and sensitivity tiers so “the second RAG” does not repeat the first failure mode.